The four AOGCMs we chose for providing boundary conditions for the
RCMs are: the Canadian Global Climate Model version 3 (CGCM3, T47
spatial resolution, [Flato 2005]); the NCAR
Community Climate Model version 3 (CCSM3, [Collins
2006]); the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) Climate
Model version 2.1 (CM2.1, [GFDL 2004]); and the
United Kingdom (UK) Hadley Centre Climate Model version 3 (HadCM3, [Gordon 2000], [Pope
2000]). Table 1, below, provides the major characteristics of each
model. More on these models and their evaluation can also be found in
Randall et al., 2007, in the references cited for
the individual models, and at the PCMDI
web site where the global model output is stored.
All four models and modeling groups have participated in all IPCC
exercises with global climate models and have well established track
records for simulating current and future climates. The equilibrium
climate sensitivities of the four models are: 3.4° C, 2.7° C,
3.4° C, and 3.3° C, respectively. The full range of climate
sensitivity for the models that participated in IPCC 2007 is
2.1°C–4.4° C. Equilibrium climate sensitivity is
defined as the global mean temperature response of an atmospheric
climate model run with a simple (slab) ocean to a doubling of
CO2. It is a measure of the climate system annual mean
temperature change in response to a doubling of CO2 after
it has attained equilibrium [Randall 2007].
Climate model sensitivity is one of the factors that results in the
range of climate change projections obtained with different AOGCMs.
It is now believed that the most likely value for climate sensitivity
is around 3.0°C [Meehl 2007], and the values
for the AOGCMs we are using bracket this value.
Model |
Sponsor |
Atmosphere
Top Resolution |
Ocean Resolution |
Sea Ice |
Coupling /
Adjustments |
Land Surface |
CCSM3 |
NCAR |
Top = 2.2 hPa
T85 (1.4x1.4°)
L=26 |
0.3-1°
L40 |
Rheology,
leads |
No adjustments |
Layers, canopy, routing |
CGCM3.1 (T47) |
CCCMA |
Top = 1 hPa
T47 (3.75°x3.7°)
L31 |
0.9 x 1.4°
L29 |
Rheology,
leads |
Heat, fresh water |
Layers, canopy, routing |
GFDL CM2.1, 2005 |
NOAA-GFDL |
Top = 3 hPa
2.0°x 2.5° |
0.3-1.0° |
Rheology,
leads |
No adjustments |
Bucket, canopy, routing |
UKMO HadCM3 |
Hadley Centre
| Top = 5 hPa
2.5°x3.75°
L19 |
1.25°x1.25°
L20 |
Free drifts,
leads |
No adjustments |
Layers, canopy, routing |
Table 1. Characteristics of the 4 AOGCMs used to provide
boundary conditions for the RCMs (adapted from [Randall 2007]). L is the number of vertical layers;
degrees (°) refer to latitude and longitude; top refers to the
pressure at the highest model atmospheric vertical level; rheology
refers to the flow (material) characteristics of sea ice (modeled as a
viscous plastic); free drifts refers to modeling of ice movement such
that ice drifts freely with the ocean currents; leads refers to
characteristics of the ice leads i.e., the fact that the model
includes ice free portions within the pack ice; routing indicates
where there is river routing prescribed in the land surface model;
layers or bucket indicates how the soil layers are modeled; canopy
indicates that a full vegetation canopy is simulated in the land
surface model.
The four AOGCM simulations that were chosen to provide boundary
conditions for the regional climate models all were generated using
the A2 emissions scenario. The results of the AOGCM simulations are
available at PCMDI at http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/ipcc/about_ipcc.php.
This data set contains output from the AOGCM simulations produced for
the IPCC 2007 report.
The realizations of each AOGCM used for NARCCAP are as follows:
*We are working on publishing the full boundary condition data through ESG, but at the moment only monthly and seasonal averages are available here.
References
Collins, W. D., et al., 2006: The Community
Climate System Model: CCSM3. J. Climate 19:2122-2143.
Flato, G. M., 2005: The third generation coupled
global climate model (CGCM3).
http://www.ec.gc.ca/ccmac-cccma/default.asp?n=1299529F-1
GFDL GAMDT (The GFDL Global Model Development Team),
2004: The new GFDL global atmospheric and land model AM2-LM2:
Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations. J. Climate
17:4641-4673.
Gordon et al., 2000: The simulation of SST, sea
ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley
Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate
Dynamics 16:147-168.
Pope et al., 2000: The impact of new physical
parameterizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3.
Climate Dynamics 16:123-146.
Meehl, G. A., 2007: Global climate projections.
In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Basis. (Solomon et al.,
eds.) Cambridge University Press:Cambridge. pp. 747-845.
Randall, D.A., et al., 2007: Climate models and
their evaluation. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical
Basis. (Solomon et al., eds.) Cambridge University
Press:Cambridge. pp. 589-662.
|